id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	priority	milestone	component	version	resolution	keywords	cc
107	Beta feedback (Giggi Liberti)	Dave Offiler	Dave Offiler	"Giggi has not actually investigated thr package, but has provided some info on
how he would have used it is he had...

For informaiton only - no action required
 
{{{
sincerely I have not yet used any version of ROPP mostly because the 
projects for
which I thougth I would need it:
- one was not accepted
- and another one just started with only 1 year of delay
In any case I will answer the questions.

Thank you
Giggi


>1) Have you downloaded the v0.9 Beta packages?
>
>  
>
NO

>- if no, do you intend to do so in the near future?
>
>  
>
NO

>- if still no, do you no longer wish to be a beta tester?
>
>  
>
YES

>- if yes, which ones?
>  TOOLS
>  IO
>  FM
>  1DVAR
>  Documentation (User Guide, Overview, README...)
>
>  
>
TOOLS, 1DVAR, Documentation

>2) What platform (operating system) and compiler(s) are
>you using, or intend to use, for the beta testing?
>
>
>  
>
LINUX-FEDORA, gcc

>3) What platform (operating system) and compiler(s) do you
>intend to use for an operational implementation ?
>
>  
>
NO oiperationa implementation

>4) Have you built/installed the downloaded packages?
>
>- if no, was this because there were problems in the ROPP build
>  itself, or in installing 3rd party dependency packages?
>
>  
>
NO, see above

>- if yes, did it go smoothly, or did you have to modify anything?
>  (And if so, what did you do to correct the problem?)
>
>
>5) Have you run any of the test scripts supplied with the packages?
>If so, which ones, and with what result?
>
>  
>
NO

>6) Have you reviewed how you would plan use the package an operational
>environment?
>
>  
>
I'm not planning any operational application

>- using the package tools as they are? Which application tools do
>  you plan to use?
>
>- porting (parts of) the code to use as callable subroutines
>  in your own applications? Which top-level routines would you
>  use?
>
>
>7) Is the documentation adequate to describe:
>
>- the overview of the packages and their functions
>
>- the build/install/test system and usage
>
>- the code descriptions
>
>
>8) Do you have any other comments about the beta package?
>What areas need to be improved?
>
}}}
"	defect	closed	trivial	1.0	ROPP (all)	0.9	fixed	Beta test feedback