Changes between Initial version and Version 1 of Ticket #193
- Timestamp:
- 2009-12-17T12:06:11Z (15 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #193
- Property Resolution → invalid
- Property Status new → closed
-
Ticket #193 – Description
initial v1 2 2 3 3 Torsten's direct emails quoted here: 4 5 4 {{{ 6 5 Hi Dave, … … 8 7 9 8 10 in addition to the mail in the morning I send you for your analysis some more data for day 08.206. DAT and DSC contain our ascii files which are the input for the gfz2ropp program. NC contains the resulting netcdf files whereas BUFR are the same data as I already send you in the first mail. 9 in addition to the mail in the morning I send you for your analysis 10 some more data for day 08.206. DAT and DSC contain our ascii files 11 which are the input for the gfz2ropp program. NC contains the 12 resulting netcdf files whereas BUFR are the same data as I already 13 send you in the first mail. 11 14 12 15 13 16 14 Some comments to the gfz2ropp program. I had to make some small changes because the output from Georg Beyerle was not exactly compatible with the GRACE data. But this is not the reason for the missing values NOAA sees. 17 Some comments to the gfz2ropp program. I had to make some small 18 changes because the output from Georg Beyerle was not exactly 19 compatible with the GRACE data. But this is not the reason for the 20 missing values NOAA sees. 15 21 16 22 … … 26 32 line 502: change of TX to TS 27 33 28 line 521/522: comment out. The program was interrupted at this line. I don't know why. 34 line 521/522: comment out. The program was interrupted at this line. 35 I don't know why. 29 36 30 line 526/527: inserted, because Georg didn't wrote the azimuth angle in the file header, but in the dsc file. 37 line 526/527: inserted, because Georg didn't wrote the azimuth 38 angle in the file header, but in the dsc file. 31 39 32 40 … … 40 48 41 49 42 Tomorrow I'm out of office for the whole day and back on Monday. So I hope you have all informations you need. 50 Tomorrow I'm out of office for the whole day and back on Monday. 51 So I hope you have all informations you need. 43 52 44 53 45 54 46 Maybe you get in contact directly with Greg (Greg.Krasowski@noaa.gov) if you have already results tomorrow? 55 Maybe you get in contact directly with Greg Greg.Krasowski@noaa.gov) 56 if you have already results tomorrow? 47 57 48 58 … … 59 69 60 70 > Hi Torsten, 61 62 71 > 63 64 72 > Could you just try adding -p0 (0=zero) to the ropp2bufr command? 65 66 73 > This forces no thinning. Also -d to output more diagnostics. 67 68 74 > Do you get the same problem with GRACE-A or is it just TSRX? 69 70 75 > 71 72 76 > I have a meeting in a few minutes, but I'll have a look at your files 73 74 77 > this afternoon. 75 76 78 > 77 78 79 > Dave 79 80 80 > -- 81 82 81 > David Offiler Head Satellite Active Sensing Group 83 84 82 > Met Office FitzRoy Road Exeter EX1 3PB United Kingdom 85 86 83 > Tel: +44 (0)1392 88 6298 Fax: +44 (0)1392 88 5681 87 88 84 > E-mail: dave.offiler@metoffice.gov.uk http://www.metoffice.gov.uk 89 90 85 > 91 92 86 > -----Original Message----- 93 94 87 > From: Torsten Schmidt [mailto:tschmidt@gfz-potsdam.de] 95 96 88 > Sent: 10 December 2009 08:57 97 98 89 > To: Offiler, Dave 99 100 90 > Cc: Greg Krasowski; Lidia Cucurull; Jens Wickert; Georg Beyerle 101 102 91 > Subject: [Fwd: Re: TerraSAR-X RO data in BUFR format] 103 104 92 > 105 106 93 > Hi Dave, 107 108 94 > 109 110 95 > as you know we are working on the TerraSAR-X (open-loop) processing 111 112 96 > and hope to have an operational software version soon. 113 114 97 > 115 116 98 > As a preliminary dataset Georg Beyerle had prepared data from a period 117 118 99 > covering some months in 2008. This dataset I've converted to bufr 119 120 100 > (same procedure as with the operational GRACE data) using the ROPP software. 121 122 101 > 123 124 102 > The problem is that NOAA sees a lot of 'strange things'. I don't know 125 126 103 > what's about Sean. He got the same dataset but I've no response from 127 128 104 > him until now. 129 130 105 > 131 132 106 > The 'strange things' are related to, e.g., missing values in the 133 134 107 > decoded data. 135 136 108 > 137 138 109 > What I've done so far was the application of the ROPP Vers.2 software 139 140 110 > just in the way I use it for the GRACE data (since February this year). 141 142 111 > 143 144 112 > Because the 'strange things' happened with Vers.2 I installed 145 146 113 > yesterday ROPP Vers.3 (ropp_utils-3.0, ropp_io-3.0) and also the new 147 148 114 > bufrpack-18.1. 149 150 115 > 151 152 116 > Then I converted one day of TSX data (08.206) by application of the 153 154 117 > following programs: (1) gfz2ropp for the conversion of the dat and dsc 155 156 118 > files to netcdf and (2) ropp2bufr ('ropp2bufr ncfile -c 78'), i.e., 157 158 119 > without thinning of the data. There were now error message as well as 159 160 120 > any warning. The results you find attached in the TSX_08.206.tar.gz 161 162 121 > archive. 163 164 122 > 165 166 123 > What I've also done for validation purposes is the conversion back to 167 168 124 > netcdf with the bufr2ropp program. I can't find any missing values in 169 170 125 > the back-converted files, but Greg from NOAA does. His error output is 171 172 126 > also attached. 173 174 127 > 175 176 128 > Dave, could you please give a comment to that. I'm not familiar with 177 178 129 > bufr data so I think you are the person that could (hopefully) solve 179 180 130 > the problem. 181 182 131 > 183 184 132 > Thank you very much. 185 186 133 > 187 188 134 > Bets regards, 189 190 135 > Torsten 191 192 193 194 136 }}} 195 137