Opened 13 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#256 closed defect
Possible levels of diagnostics in ROPP — at Version 1
Reported by: | Ian Culverwell | Owned by: | Ian Culverwell |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | Whenever |
Component: | ROPP (all) | Version: | 5.0 |
Keywords: | Diagnostics | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
User Kjartan Kinch has raised the following issue (in connection to ticket #255):
Finally this lead us here at DMI to a little bit of a discussion about levels of diagnostic. We will probably want to be adding variables to diagnostic output now and then and this might become a hassle for you - particularly since I've just asked you to expand the documentation of diagnostic variables. We talked about whether there might be a sense in having three levels of diagnostic output. Something like: NONE, STANDARD and FULL. Where NONE would correspond to the current setting diag = .false. . STANDARD would then be a limited, but fully documented, set and FULL would be a longer list that we could add to without causing too much pain and that was primarily intended for internal use. My own personal view is that right now such an approach is probably overkill and we are fine with diag = .true./.false. right now, but you can turn the idea over in your head.
Certainly sounds feasible. Would it be useful? Opinions?
Change history (1)
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Milestone: | → 7.0 |
Status: | new → assigned |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.