The import of the CVS repository created several tags and a branch with names reasonable for CVS, but somewhat strange otherwise. Rename them to something useful.

Change history (3)

comment:1 by frcm, 19 years ago

Status: newassigned

comment:2 by frcm, 19 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

I've changed all tags for all parts of the repository. Old, existing tags have only been altered slightly (e.g., something like ropp_io_v_0_1 under cvs was changed to ropp_io-0.1). For the future, I would suggest the following convention for tag names under the tags subdirectories in the Subversion repository:

  • n.n or n.n.n

for sources, test folder and web site. I have dropped most of the lengthy cvs-style tag names for simplicity, in line with the intended use of the Subversion repository structure. This allows the export of a given version (say 0.7) into a local subdirectory (say ropp) by a command like (for the ropp sources)

svn export svn://eld001/ROPP_svn/ropp_src/tags/0.7 ropp

This is different for the documents, as I would expect that different documents will be versioned independently from each other. Thus, each document should have it's own tag name like

  • <doc_abbrev>-n.n

where <doc_abbrev> is one of tld or ug (or whatever else comes up). This would mean, however, that we are tagging the documents individually rather than all at once; which is slightly inconsistent with the way we work with the source code.

comment:3 by (none), 16 years ago

Milestone: 0.8

Milestone 0.8 deleted

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.