#1 closed defect (fixed)
Rename CVS tags and branches
Reported by: | frcm | Owned by: | frcm |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ROPP (all) | Version: | 0.7 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
The import of the CVS repository created several tags and a branch with names reasonable for CVS, but somewhat strange otherwise. Rename them to something useful.
Change history (3)
comment:1 by , 20 years ago
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
comment:2 by , 20 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
I've changed all tags for all parts of the repository. Old, existing tags have only been altered slightly (e.g., something like ropp_io_v_0_1 under cvs was changed to ropp_io-0.1). For the future, I would suggest the following convention for tag names under the tags subdirectories in the Subversion repository:
for sources, test folder and web site. I have dropped most of the lengthy cvs-style tag names for simplicity, in line with the intended use of the Subversion repository structure. This allows the export of a given version (say 0.7) into a local subdirectory (say ropp) by a command like (for the ropp sources)
This is different for the documents, as I would expect that different documents will be versioned independently from each other. Thus, each document should have it's own tag name like
where <doc_abbrev> is one of tld or ug (or whatever else comes up). This would mean, however, that we are tagging the documents individually rather than all at once; which is slightly inconsistent with the way we work with the source code.