Opened 19 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#45 closed defect (fixed)
Beta test feedback - JA
| Reported by: | Dave Offiler | Owned by: | Dave Offiler |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 1.0 |
| Component: | ROPP (all) | Version: | 0.8 |
| Keywords: | beta feedback | Cc: |
Description
- Did you find the installation manual helpful, are there any parts
missing or ambiguous or did not provide enough information?
I would appreciate a more intuitive setup (maybe a very short focused high level README).
There were several packed files.It was not obvious which were the necessary files/libraries. Probably this could be simplified to a single packed file (which may then, when unpacked, include several subdirectories with libraries/test/etc).
Jospec Aparicio 14/11/2005
Change history (6)
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
| Keywords: | beta feedback added |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | 0.9 → 1.0 |
| Priority: | normal → low |
| severity: | normal → minor |
| Version: | 0.8 |
comment:2 by , 18 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:3 by , 18 years ago
| Version: | → 0.8 |
|---|
comment:4 by , 13 years ago
| Resolution: | fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
comment:5 by , 13 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → assigned |
comment:6 by , 13 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
New, top-level documentation (README) included on the Beta v0.9 distribution website describing the packages and generic build system.
The ROPP distribution will remain as a number (4 in ROPP-1) of sub-packges for separate installation since users may not require all of them. Distributing ROPP in a single tarball would abe inefficient. The top-level documentasion makes the purpose, and inter-dependencies between sub-packages clearer.